On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Calvin Johnson <calvin.john...@nxp.com> wrote: > Hi York, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: York Sun >> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 12:00 AM >> To: Calvin Johnson <calvin.john...@nxp.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de >> Cc: Anji Jagarlmudi <anji.jagarlm...@nxp.com>; Joe Hershberger >> <joe.hershber...@ni.com>; Prabhakar Kushwaha >> <prabhakar.kushw...@nxp.com> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ls1012a: fix tftp failure >> >> On 11/21/2017 10:26 PM, Calvin Johnson wrote: >> > This patch series fixes bug which fails tftp sometimes >> > while using the pfe interfaces and also has some code clean up. >> > >> > >> > Calvin Johnson (3): >> > drivers: net: pfe_eth: add pfe_rx_done to clear bd after packet >> > processing >> > drivers: net: pfe_eth: use writel/readl to access hw bds >> > drivers: net: pfe_eth: cleanup typos and indent >> > >> > drivers/net/pfe_eth/pfe_driver.c | 126 +++++++++++++++++++++++----- >> ----------- >> > drivers/net/pfe_eth/pfe_eth.c | 13 ++-- >> > include/pfe_eth/pfe_driver.h | 1 + >> > 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) >> > >> >> Your PFE patch set is not fully reviewed or accepted. If I were you, I >> would probably send v2 version to include all the changes. >> >> It is up to Joe to decide to take a new version, or patches on top of >> patches.
It's assigned to York in patchwork. would you prefer I take them? > I can squash all these follow up patches to v2 of the base pfe patch series. > Yes, it will be better than having these patches on top of it as the base is > not yet merged. > > Thanks > Calvin > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot