>>>>> "Jagan" == Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Peter Korsgaard <pe...@korsgaard.com> wrote: >>>>>>> "Maxime" == Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> writes: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig >> >> @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ config MACH_SUN50I >> >> select SUNXI_DRAM_DW_32BIT >> >> select FIT >> >> select SPL_LOAD_FIT >> >> + imply FIT_SIGNATURE >> >> > I'm really not sure we should force it by default. How much code size >> > is it adding? >> >> Not only that, enabling FIT_SIGNATURE support disables support for the >> legacy images (uImage / boot.scr) for security reasons, so it may very >> well break existing setups. > Sorry, I didn't get why legacy images will disable with fit? It > depends how user can go with it, whether he want legacy or fit both > will work. Not when you enable CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE. That option disables support for the legacy images. -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
