On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 01:43:40PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Now the u-boot spi image is greater than 0x90000, increase the same in
> env during spi erase.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_ab...@ti.com>
> ---
>  include/configs/ti_armv7_keystone2.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/configs/ti_armv7_keystone2.h 
> b/include/configs/ti_armv7_keystone2.h
> index 562bb65..7fb3aaf 100644
> --- a/include/configs/ti_armv7_keystone2.h
> +++ b/include/configs/ti_armv7_keystone2.h
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@
>                                       "${bootdir}/${fit_bootfile}\0"  \
>       "get_uboot_net=dhcp ${loadaddr} ${tftp_root}/${name_uboot}\0"   \
>       "get_uboot_nfs=nfs ${loadaddr} ${nfs_root}/boot/${name_uboot}\0" \
> -     "burn_uboot_spi=sf probe; sf erase 0 0x90000; "         \
> +     "burn_uboot_spi=sf probe; sf erase 0 0x100000; "                \
>               "sf write ${loadaddr} 0 ${filesize}\0"          \
>       "burn_uboot_nand=nand erase 0 0x100000; "                       \
>               "nand write ${loadaddr} 0 ${filesize}\0"                \

Can we future proof this?  Where is the next bit of content located in
the SPI flash?  We should erase up to that instead I think.  Thanks!

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to