On 18.01.2018 22:19, Paul Burton wrote:
> When constraining the highest DDR address that U-Boot will use for its
> data & relocated self, we need to handle the common case in which a 32
> bit system with 2GB DDR will have a zero gd->ram_top, due to the
> addition of 2GB (0x80000000) to the base address of kseg0 (also
> 0x80000000) which overflows & wraps to 0.
>
> We originally had a check for this case, but it was lost in commit
> 78edb25729ce ("boston: Provide physical CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE") causing
> problems for the affected 32 bit systems.I think I did a wrong conflict resolution because the patch didn't apply anymore. I folded this patch into "boston: Provide physical CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE" to fix this. Actually I wanted to resend the updated patches. But if you are okay with the current state in u-boot-mips/next branch, I'll take them as they are. BTW: could you resend your series "boston: Ethernet support for MIPS Boston board"? I still have no Acks or Reviews on the generic DM parts. Thanks. -- - Daniel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
