On 22.01.2018 15:59, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 03:56:09PM +0100, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> On 22.01.2018 13:58, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:20:56AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tom, >>>> >>>> Please pull this PR. >>>> >>>> thanks! >>>> Jagan. >>>> >>>> The following changes since commit >>>> 98691a60abffb44303d7dae6e9e699d0daded930: >>>> >>>> Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-rockchip (2018-01-09 13:28:51 -0500) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-spi.git master >>>> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to b23c685c6f295da3c01dd487f0e003b70299af91: >>>> >>>> mips: bmips: enable the SPI flash on the Comtrend AR-5387un (2018-01-22 >>>> 10:39:13 +0530) >>>> >>> >>> NAK: >>> >>> commit 19e3a4856c1cba751a9ecb3931ff0d96a7f169be >>> Author: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <nolt...@gmail.com> >>> Date: Sat Jan 20 02:11:34 2018 +0100 >>> >>> wait_bit: add 8/16/32 BE/LE versions of wait_for_bit >>> >>> Add 8/16/32 bits and BE/LE versions of wait_for_bit. >>> This is needed for reading registers that are not aligned to 32 bits, >>> and for >>> Big Endian platforms. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <nolt...@gmail.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierz...@gmail.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <ja...@openedev.com> >>> >>> Adds warnings on almost all platforms: >>> w+(ls1088ardb_qspi_SECURE_BOOT) ../include/wait_bit.h: In function >>> ?wait_for_bit_be16?: >>> w+(ls1088ardb_qspi_SECURE_BOOT) ../include/wait_bit.h:76:31: warning: >>> implicit declaration of function ?readw_be? >>> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >>> w+(ls1088ardb_qspi_SECURE_BOOT) ../include/wait_bit.h: In function >>> ?wait_for_bit_be32?: w+(ls1088ardb_qspi_SECURE_BOOT) >>> ../include/wait_bit.h:78:31: warning: implicit declaration of function >>> ?readl_be? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >>> >> >> >> did this commit alone produce those warnings? The patch series itself >> builds successfully on Travis CI [1]. >> >> [1] https://travis-ci.org/danielschwierzeck/u-boot/builds/331506036 > > It builds, yes. But it adds that warning too: > https://travis-ci.org/danielschwierzeck/u-boot/jobs/331506059 > > And I bisect'd down to the above commit being what adds that warning. > > And yes, sigh, I need to something-something to get us back to zero > warnings and make -Werror at least a CONFIG option and perhaps default > in travis as this isn't the first warning to come in that wasn't noticed > as travis didn't fail. >
hm, since when are gcc warnings being ignored? I thought only DTC warnings were suppressed. Thus I still expected to have Travis CI builds marked as yellow in case of gcc warnings ;) -- - Daniel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot