We should take the MX6DP and MX6QP options in consideration
in the I2C_PADS_INFO macro.

Based on a patch by Pierluigi Passaro <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Eran Matityahu <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/mach-imx/mxc_i2c.h | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach-imx/mxc_i2c.h 
b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach-imx/mxc_i2c.h
index 292bf0c..80018e4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach-imx/mxc_i2c.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach-imx/mxc_i2c.h
@@ -88,8 +88,7 @@ struct mxc_i2c_bus {
 
 
 #define I2C_PADS_INFO(name)    \
-       (is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6Q) || is_cpu_type(MXC_CPU_MX6D)) ? \
-                                       &mx6q_##name : &mx6s_##name
+       (is_mx6dq() || is_mx6dqp()) ? &mx6q_##name : &mx6s_##name
 #endif
 
 int setup_i2c(unsigned i2c_index, int speed, int slave_addr,
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to