On 26/02/18 14:56, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
Now, I am confused.
Fair enough.
In my view there are really only two required paths i.e. kever's stuff
can use the existing "tee" type, let's not discuss a third option further.
So for clarity the proposal is
1. Maintain the existing "tee" as is.
As regards changing the name of "tee" to "tee-standalone" I'd like
to get Tom or Andrew (both) to say that's what is wanted.
Since it's TI boards that are using the "tee" name in mkimage
upstream the name-change is churn there.
Andrew, Tom ?
2. Add a new bootable type
The set of names we have for that is
{tee-bootable, tee-chainload, tee-with-payload}
I have no strong feelings about the name for the new type either way
:)
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
