Hi Tom, On 4 February 2018 at 02:13, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 10:12:41AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> On 26 January 2018 at 17:50, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 02:45:29PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Tom, >> >> >> >> Here are some additions to logging and 64-bit sandbox support. >> >> >> >> >> >> The following changes since commit >> >> ab12aa24e619b5e81cbde7de88c6d9a19f04313b: >> >> >> >> ARM: socfpga: Convert callers of cm_write_with_phase for >> >> wait_for_bit_le32 (2018-01-26 13:08:03 -0500) >> >> >> >> are available in the Git repository at: >> >> >> >> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-dm.git >> >> >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 4e94617bf911595efcecf52d6c9f323744a81cda: >> >> >> >> log: add category LOGC_EFI (2018-01-26 12:20:55 -0700) >> >> >> > >> > NAK: >> > Starting LLVM-3.8 test >> > common/log.c:44:17: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type >> > 'enum log_category_t' to different enumeration type 'enum uclass_id' >> > [-Wenum-conversion] >> > if (log_uc_cat(cat) >= LOGC_NONE) >> > ~~~~~~~~~~ ^~~ >> > common/log.c:47:36: warning: implicit conversion from enumeration type >> > 'enum log_category_t' to different enumeration type 'enum uclass_id' >> > [-Wenum-conversion] >> > return uclass_get_name(log_uc_cat(cat)); >> > ~~~~~~~~~~ ^~~ >> > 2 warnings generated. >> > >> > Also, checkpatch.pl notes that the sandbox64 defconfig isn't caught by >> > MAINTAINERS and then I see the 32bit one already isn't. >> > >> > Finally, I see a bunch of warnings on sandbox64: >> > lib/fdtdec.c: In function ‘fdtdec_get_addr_size_auto_noparent’: >> > include/fdtdec.h:27:25: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to >> > unsigned type [-Woverflow] >> > #define FDT_ADDR_T_NONE (-1ULL) >> > >> > That's with my normal 64bit host gcc (5.4.0, Ubuntu 16.04). >> >> OK I'll drop sandbox64 for now. I'm not sure why buildman was happy, >> but I may have missed it because there are already a lot of warnings >> with sandbox. I'll see if I can fix those. I need to add clang to my >> workflow... > > It's not too hard. Note that if you go newer than 3.8 there's a ton of > warnings I haven't had time to look into. And I only test sandbox with > clang atm.
I don't see any warnings doing this: $ make -s -j10 HOSTCC=clang-3.8 O=b/sandbox/ sandbox_defconfig all $ make -s -j10 HOSTCC=clang-3.8 O=b/sandbox64/ sandbox64_defconfig all $ How do I get the warnings? Regards Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
