On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:50:39PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 9:44 PM, Maxime Ripard
>> <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 04:34:43PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> >> +CONFIG_CMD_USB_MASS_STORAGE=y
>> >
>> > You still haven't explained why this is useful to add it by default on
>> > this particular board.
>>
>> This board does have only eMMC and no external storage
>> possibilities(like eMMC or Ethernet) so to copy images between eMMC vs
>> host intermediate way (other than fastboot) ums can be the possible
>> way.
>
> We have fastboot and DFU to address that already, and a number of
> other boards accomodate that just fine (the CHIP, the NES Classic,
> etc.).

Yes, but ums is different where we can simply mount the flash on host
and update the partitions data directly instead of create partitions
with new data to write again. what's wrong with using ums. I always
believe fastboot, DFU is different than ums where former need to
create image file and later simply copy.

Jagan.

-- 
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to