Hi,

On 31 May 2018 at 02:08,  <tien.fong.c...@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.c...@intel.com>
>
> Update the dma_memcpy description on return argument for DMA330 driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.c...@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/dma.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/dma.h b/include/dma.h
> index 0a0c9dd..b825c1e 100644
> --- a/include/dma.h
> +++ b/include/dma.h
> @@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ int dma_get_device(u32 transfer_type, struct udevice 
> **devp);
>   * @dst - destination pointer
>   * @src - souce pointer
>   * @len - data length to be copied
> - * @return - on successful transfer returns no of bytes
> -            transferred and on failure return error code.
> + * @return - on successful transfer returns no of bytes or zero(for DMA330)
> + *          transferred and on failure return error code.

This is a public API so you cannot change it just for one device. You
can change the API for everyone if you like.

But why would it want to return 0?

>   */
>  int dma_memcpy(struct udevice *dev, void *dst, void *src, size_t len);
>
> --
> 2.2.0
>

Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to