Hi, On 18 June 2018 at 03:47, Miquel Raynal <miquel.ray...@bootlin.com> wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > > > Nevertheless one question: Why did you define another dts binding > > > > instead of using that one what is already available on the Linux > > > > kernel? There is "tcg,tpm_tis-spi" already defined. > > > > > > I did not know this one, actually I mostly worked on U-Boot. > > > > > > However, this compatible is misleading as it does not make any difference > > > between v1.x and v2.0 specification. > > > > But on the other hand it would give us a chance to determine the version at > > runtime what could be beneficial for firmware updates. But this is a > > special case. > > We already discussed that point on the ML and decided to choose the > version at compile time. I did not have the firmware update case in > mind though.
I think we need to move to determining the version at run-time, allowing people to build U-Boot with both versions if needed. This will be helpful for testing in particular. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
