On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 08:19:50AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Sam, > > In message <20180717220912.11358-1-semen.protse...@linaro.org> you wrote: > > This is just a draft to discuss ideas related to "Make U-Boot log great > > again" thread. > > > > With this patch we will have something like this: > > > > Loading Environment from FAT... Failed (-5) > > Loading Environment from MMC... OK > > > > instead of this: > > > > Loading Environment from FAT... MMC: no card present > > ** Bad device mmc 0 ** > > Failed (-5) > > Loading Environment from MMC... OK > > Why do you think an error message "Failed (-5)" looks great? > > From a user's point of view, the "MMC: no card present" > is _much_ better (but of course it could still be improved). > > Printing cryptic error codes has never been a good idea and is > definitly not a "great" idea.
Agreed, I don't think we want to go down the path of just suppressing some of these error messages, that's not helpful. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
