On 20.08.18 20:54, Simon Glass wrote: > This partially reverts commit 7e21fbca26d18327cf7cabaad08df276a06a07d8. > > That change broke sandbox EFI support for unknown reasons. It also changes
Wouldn't it be better to just figure out the reasons? So far all bugs I've found were linker script related and quite obvious once you start to dig into them. > sandbox to use--gc-sections which we don't want. Why don't we want gc-sections with sandbox? > For now I am just reverting the sandbox portion as presumably this change > is safe on other architectures. Sandbox is your target, so you're free to do whatever you like :). But I'm not sure this is the right path forward. I'd rather like to keep things consistent. So what do you expect happens with this patch? A resend of a patch 1/18 by itself doesn't really tell me what you're trying to say. Alex _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
