Hi Andy, On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 16:27 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 21:03 +0800, Bin Meng wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko >> > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> > I did not find the discussion. Do we need revert the changes in U- >> > Boot? >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10098529/ >> >> It seems it has been dropped b/c v2 were sent and actually v3 was >> anticipated, but never appear. > > Hmm... I'm wrong there is v3 and stated as applied. > > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1559618.htm > l > > Though in next-20180112 it was appeared last time. > > > > This one seems explains what is the issue with this field > > https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org/msg04706.htm > l > >> >> Also I didn't notice any blessing from hpa about protocol extension. >
Sorry to bring this again. Looks as of today the addition to the acpi_rsdp_addr member is still not merged mainstream kernel. Do you think we need revert this in U-Boot, or keep it there but may cause some confusion? Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot