On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:46 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/02/2018 08:41 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 09/02/2018 08:00 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> On 08/26/2018 08:45 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Add DM support to the SH QSPI driver while retaining non-DM support. >>>>>>> The later is required as this driver is used in SPL which has a size >>>>>>> limitation of 16 kiB. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+rene...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwama...@nigauri.org> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> drivers/spi/sh_qspi.c | 215 >>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >>>>>>> 1 file changed, 150 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/sh_qspi.c b/drivers/spi/sh_qspi.c >>>>>>> index e9123e2c39..64dfd748d6 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/spi/sh_qspi.c >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/spi/sh_qspi.c >>>>>>> @@ -67,15 +67,12 @@ struct sh_qspi_regs { >>>>>>> }; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> struct sh_qspi_slave { >>>>>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_DM_SPI >>>>>> >>>>>> We are trying to drop non-dm code as much as possible (with >>>>>> MIGRATION.txt policy), how about adding PLTADATA or spi read glue code >>>>>> or any other? >>>>> >>>>> The SPL on that board (silk) has 16 kiB limit, right now I am at 15500 B >>>>> with gcc 7.x already, adding any more overhead will make it overflow. So >>>>> while I'd like to have it all fancy DM and stuff, it's not possible. >>>> >>>> How about having simple glue code for SPL, since it anyway used for >>>> read in real? >>> >>> I'd prefer to use the same driver for both SPL and U-Boot instead of >>> hacking stuff up. Not sure what exactly you mean by "glue" though. >> >> Something that bypass spi stack and read the flash with local code, >> this usually suited for low SRAM size like silk example >> spl_spi_sunxi.c > > But I am not _that_ cripplingly low, so I'd prefer to stick to a > standard solution instead of some hack.
OK, is this a fix or shall I take it for next? _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot