Chemparathy, Cyril wrote: > Wolfgang, > > [...] >>>> Is "davinci" correct here? >>> Yes, this SOC has the exact same controller as on Davinci, and therefore >>> the NAND driver is reused. >> But you don't call this a "Davinci"-Board, or do you? > > "Davinci NAND" is a bit of a misnomer since this particular EMIF block is > commonly used across multiple TI devices. Unfortunately, this misnomer > (amongst others) carries forward into the kernel too. Consequently, if we > use a different device name here, the mtdparts variable won't be usable as > a kernel command-line argument. > > Regards > Cyril.
Cyril, This is a good reason, let us make sure it is propagated. Please add this explanation as a comment in the config file. Tom > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
