On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:30:11PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 11/22/2018 02:28 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:24:49PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> On 11/22/2018 01:52 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote: > >>> > >>>> Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:56 Uhr schrieb Simon Glass > >>>> <s...@chromium.org>: > >>>>> > >>>>> This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_BLK by the deadline. > >>>>> Remove it. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> As the board is still mainted I will NAK it for the moment. Are there > >>>> any hints want needs to be done > >>>> to port thie board over to new DM stuff? > >>> > >>> Yes, as a start you need to switch over to using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL and > >>> selecting/providing a dtb file. I see ot1200 is using DWC_AHSATA which > >>> needs more work, but this is the board-level work that needs doing. > >> > >> Wasn't there a possibility to use platform data in board file instead of > >> DT ? Or is DT mandatory now , including the libfdt overhead ? > > > > In short, DT for U-Boot and platform data for SPL is what's recommended, > > yes. > > If the board is limited, can it use only platdata ? Some platforms don't > even have DT support at all.
I'm sorry, I don't quite follow you. If the board has limited resources prior to full U-Boot then yes, platform data. If the board has so limited resources during full U-Boot that we can't have a DT, what platform are we talking about? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
