Kim Phillips wrote: > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:06:02 +0300 > Michael Zaidman <michael.zaid...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Kim Phillips >> <kim.phill...@freescale.com> wrote: >>> before, MPC8349ITX boots u-boot in 4.3sec: >> [snip] >>> after, MPC8349ITX boots u-boot in 3.0sec: >> Thanks for the good news! Memory POST test on my board with icach >> disabled was lasting for hours until I enabled icach locally before >> and disabled it after time consuming tests. >> >> BTW is there any reason that you enable icach in board specific rather >> than in common code? > > not really, was just following the existing HID0-setting paradigm - > I presume the paradigm came about to allow different cpu/board > combinations to enable/disable different HID bits. Does that not sound > valid to you?
Shouldn't you be using icache_enable(), or at least using HID0_INIT to do invalidation and lock clearing? -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot