On 01/18/2019 07:14 AM, Anup Patel wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 11:51 PM
To: Anup Patel <anup.pa...@wdc.com>; Rick Chen <r...@andestech.com>;
Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>; Joe Hershberger
<joe.hershber...@ni.com>; Lukas Auer <lukas.a...@aisec.fraunhofer.de>;
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>; Simon Glass
<s...@chromium.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com>; Paul Walmsley
<paul.walms...@sifive.com>; Atish Patra <atish.pa...@wdc.com>;
Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org>; U-Boot Mailing List <u-
b...@lists.denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: Add fixed-factor clock driver

On 01/17/2019 11:39 AM, Anup Patel wrote:
This patch adds fixed-factor clock driver which derives clock rate by
dividing (div) and multiplying (mult) fixed factors to a parent clock.

Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.pa...@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.pa...@wdc.com>
---
   drivers/clk/Makefile           |  4 +-
   drivers/clk/clk_fixed_factor.c | 74
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
   create mode 100644 drivers/clk/clk_fixed_factor.c

diff --git a/drivers/clk/Makefile b/drivers/clk/Makefile index
2f4446568c..fa59259ea3 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@
   # Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, w...@denx.de.
   #

-obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)CLK) += clk-uclass.o clk_fixed_rate.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)CLK) += clk-uclass.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)CLK) += clk_fixed_rate.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_TPL_)CLK) += clk_fixed_factor.o

   obj-y += imx/
   obj-y += tegra/
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_fixed_factor.c
b/drivers/clk/clk_fixed_factor.c new file mode 100644 index
0000000000..eab1724c26
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_fixed_factor.c
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2019 Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates.
+ *
+ * Author: Anup Patel <anup.pa...@wdc.com>  */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <clk-uclass.h>
+#include <div64.h>
+#include <dm.h>
+
+struct clk_fixed_factor {
+       struct clk parent;
+       unsigned int div;
+       unsigned int mult;
+};
+
+#define to_clk_fixed_factor(dev)       \
+       ((struct clk_fixed_factor *)dev_get_platdata(dev))
+
+static ulong clk_fixed_factor_get_rate(struct clk *clk) {
+       int ret;
+       struct clk_fixed_factor *ff = to_clk_fixed_factor(clk->dev);
+
+       if (clk->id != 0)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       ret = clk_get_rate(&ff->parent);
+       if (IS_ERR_VALUE(ret))
+               return ret;
+
+       do_div(ret, ff->div);
+
+       return ret * ff->mult;
+}
+
+const struct clk_ops clk_fixed_factor_ops = {
+       .get_rate = clk_fixed_factor_get_rate, };
+
+static int clk_fixed_factor_ofdata_to_platdata(struct udevice *dev) {
+#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA)
Why do you need this?
This is for boards/configuration where OF_PLATDATA is not enabled. For such 
boards, the board support code will provide platdata.

I saw similar thing in clk_fixed_rate.c too hence kept it here. Do you want me to drop 
this "#if"?

I would prefer if we don't advocate OF_PLATDATA more than we have to. So I'm all for making it harder to use it :). In other words, yes, please drop support for it for now.


Alex

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to