On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:39:35 +0530 Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:30:44 +0530 > > Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 8:26 AM Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 1:38 AM Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 4:08 PM Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > As of commit aa8fee415f46 ("ARM: dts: sun8i: h3: Split out > > > > > > non-SoC-specific parts of Bananapi M2 Plus") in the Linux kernel, > > > > > > the > > > > > > device tree for the Bananapi M2+ has been split into a common dtsi > > > > > > file, > > > > > > and an SoC-specific board device tree file that includes both the > > > > > > shared > > > > > > dtsi file and the soc dtsi file. This was done to support both the > > > > > > H3 > > > > > > and H5 variants of the same board. This is similar to what was doen > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > s/doen/done > > > > > > > > Good catch. > > > > > > > > > > the Libre Computer ALL-H3-CC in U-boot commit d7b17f1c24af ("sunxi: > > > > > > Split > > > > > > out common board design for ALL-H3-CC device tree"). > > > > > > > > > > > > The newly split files are directly synced from Linux tag v5.0-rc1. > > > > > > > > > > Better sync all dts(i) files on this relevant SoC, this would help to > > > > > track and use for rest of SoC's are inline to the same version later. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok. Would syncing with linux-next (5.1) work for you? FYI all the PRs > > > > for the next release have been sent out. > > > > > > Yes, better we can pick relevant version on during next MW. > > > > I think what Chen-Yu wanted to hint at is that you can this already, by > > picking the patches from the currently existing branches of the linux-sunxi > > repository: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sunxi/linux.git/log/?h=sunxi/dt64-for-5.1 > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sunxi/linux.git/log/?h=sunxi/dt-for-5.1 > > > > There should be no need to wait for the Linux MW to close. > > Not for Linux, I'm referring here about u-boot MW. Why do we have to wait for so long? The next U-Boot MW is about two months away from now. And with U-Boot's usage of the DT we can surely minimise the risk of breaking something, by just reviewing that the DT changes do not touch or interfere with any devices that U-Boot cares about. This way we can get up-to-date DTs now (which UEFI boot benefits from), so that users don't have to provide "their own" DTs. Cheers, Andre. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot