On 3/19/19 6:12 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:31:32PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 3/8/19 1:10 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
From: Thierry Reding <tred...@nvidia.com>
In order to support chainloading of U-Boot by an earlier bootloader,
make sure the binary is position independent, so that the earlier boot-
loader can relocate it if necessary.
Why not enable this for all 64-bit Tegra? They're all booted the exact same
way at least with recent L4T builds.
Yeah, I think that would make sense.
Also, U-Boot is typically linked to the address that cboot loads it to, and
cboot typically always loads to precisely that address. I'm not sure why
this patch is required.
I encountered this issue when I was trying to chainload U-Boot from
cboot on Jetson TX1. It seems like your above comment is no longer true,
though I suppose that could just mean that the link address for U-Boot
has become stale?
Looks like the upstream CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE is indeed stale relative to
the latest L4T builds:
Upstream:
Jetson TX1: CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x80110000
Jetson TX2: CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x80080000
L4T r32.1:
Jetson TX1: #define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x80080000
Jetson TX2: #define CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE 0x80080000
That said, it don't think it harms anything, so I'm fine with it being
applied.
I suppose there's a bit of extra code to do the indirect jumps, but
overall U-Boot seems to work well and not noticeably slower if this is
enabled. Might be nice for extra flexibility and to avoid any surprises
if we ever end up loading U-Boot to a location other than where it was
liked to.
My understanding is that this could happen on Tegra186 if cboot detects
bad memory blocks in the area where U-Boot was meant to be loaded to. I
guess this doesn't apply to earlier chips, but perhaps it's good to have
it there for consistency anyway.
Yes, this could happen on Jetson TX2i at least.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
