On 22.04.19 21:29, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 08:40:52PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Am 22.04.2019 um 16:36 schrieb Tom Rini:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:12:36PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Heinrich,
On 02.04.19 19:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
The SPL image for the Tinker Board has to fit into 32 KiB. This includes
up to 2 KiB for the file header.
A new configuration variable CONFIG_SPL_SIZE_LIMIT is introduced to define
the board specific limit.
A common Makefile function is used for this test and the test against
CONFIG_BOARD_SIZE_LIMIT.
Move the board size check from arch/arm/mach-imx/Makefile to Makefile.
Has anything from this series been applied? I now have a working patch that
applies on top of this and adds a full SPL SRAM size check (including HEAP,
GD and stack; via a host tool) which works for socfpga (as an example of a
platform where SPL binary is loaded to limited SRAM).
Actually, my patch would replace your patch 3/4 but build on 1/4 (2/4 and
4/4 are arch-specific).
How should we proceed here? I could send a series including your 1/4, or I
could send a series completely building on this series, at the downside of
more or less reverting your 2/4.
What I would like to see is i.MX (and rockchip) converted to use your
new test as well (also, yay! Thanks for following up on that!) and we
drop the existing check here.
Ok, so while I cannot really help on i.MX and rockchip, why don't you accept
this series from Heinrich and I'll send my patch as followup? Then we can
discuss this with i.MX and rockchip maintainers.
Can you post your series now, and we can move from there? Thanks!
Did that:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1088865/
[Depends on this series from Heinrich]
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
