On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 02:34:32PM +0200, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > Hi Marek > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 1:27 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > > > On 4/29/19 1:24 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 01:06:57PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > >> On 4/29/19 1:02 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > > >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:28 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> On 4/29/19 12:40 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > > >>>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:24 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 4/28/19 10:47 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > > >>>>>>> Mark MXS_SPI has BROKEN, this so the resulting build shows > > >>>>>>> warning for broken configuration enabled and associated code > > >>>>>>> will remove in v2019.07 release. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> But the code is not broken, it works fine, right ? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Yes the code work fine, but dm conversion not done yet. Now the > > >>>>> CONFIG_BROKEN can mark the driver configs which doesn't convert dm > > >>>> > > >>>> That makes no sense, if the code works, it works and thus it is NOT > > >>>> broken. Find some other way to flag it as non-DM-converted, not this > > >>>> hack. > > >>> > > >>> np, It depends on whether we consider non-dm code(for legacy SPI > > >>> drivers) is broken or not, let Tom comment on this. > > >> > > >> Again, the code works, it's not broken. That's very clear. > > >> DM conversion is a separate matter, so let's not overload CONFIG_BROKEN > > >> for such things. The Makefile warning seems sufficient to me. > > > > > > The code is broken because it doesn't work with DM and is going to be > > > removed due to lack of maintenance soon. My problem with this series, > > > but I need to check that we can do what I want to do and still keep > > > travis green, is have this (and the other non-converted and thus > > > non-maintained drivers) depend on, not select BROKEN. > > > > > > The Makefile warnings tell people the code is going to be removed and > > > I'm trying to have the window be: > > > 1) LOUD warning about needing work > > > 2) 1 release past those loud deadlines of the code there, but not built > > > unless you enable BROKEN (as yes, I see code that's not updated to use > > > DM as being broken) > > > 3) Code removed. > > > > > > All that said, I continue to be open to delaying conversion / removal if > > > we're having: > > > - A discussion and proposed patches to do the conversion, but people > > > need more time. The work is in progress, but people need time as it's > > > not as easy to convert as hoped for various reasons. > > > - A problem converting the driver to DM as it's highlighting some other > > > problem within DM or hitting a size constraint or other problem. > > > - Someone who is willing to do the DM work is just now seeing this. > > > Yes, this is possible especially since our LOUD Makefile warnings are > > > also easy enough to miss if you're just automating the build and not > > > doing it manually. > > > > > > But I am not fine with: > > > - Code that isn't converted AND > > > - Code that no one seems to be converting AND > > > - Code that no one says they are going to convert AND > > > - The conversion deadline has past. > > > > Seems there was some offer from Amarula to convert it , no ? > > we can do some job on imx28 because we have a board there. I have asked > to mainline it
OK, good. Can you and Marek please coordinate on: - Updating MAINTAINERS files - Dropping the boards that won't be supported moving forward (even if you can't mainline the custom board, there must be a ref platform you have/use, yes?). And Michael, can you please subscribe to the u-boot-maintainers list? Jagan, was there an old patch to try and convert this driver that may be of help to Michael? Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot