Hello Marek,
Am 30.04.2019 um 03:49 schrieb Marek Behun:
I would really like not to see such board specific code added to this
driver.
Frankly, I fail to understand why used udelay(11) instead of udelay(10)
should result in such a difference on your board. Could you please
investigate a bit more and hopefully come up with a "better" solution
for this issue?
Thanks,
Stefan
Hi Stefan, I think I found what was the issue, just sent a patch series
for Omnia, the last patch explains my theory and fixes the issue with
one ndelay(100)
You mean tha patch series
"[U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot-marvell v2 00/15] Fixes for Turris Omnia"
So we can ignore this patch?
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-52 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: h...@denx.de
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
