Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1274392850.18152.253.ca...@petert> you wrote: > > I didn't express it well, but what I was getting at was that the > "Testing X .. Y" would ideally state exactly what is being tested.
We have full agreement here. > Unaligned addresses would still be allowed. I think right now the end > address is always automatically aligned to the same alignment as the > start address though, so the current output is very misleading. Agreed, too. > You can see the starting alignment was respected, but the ending > alignment was truncated to be 32-bit aligned to the starting address. > In the above example, I think it would be nice to see "Testing > 00001003 ... 00001ffe". Or some other way such that the user knows that > their input wasn't executed to a T; their end address was truncated. Yep. We are in sync. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "Who alone has reason to *lie himself out* of actuality? He who *suffers* from it." - Friedrich Nietzsche _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot