Hi Sam, On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 12:54:24AM +0300, Sam Protsenko wrote: > Hi Eugeniu, > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:41 PM Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeuge...@gmail.com> wrote: [..] > > Since the next A/B patches will apparently depend on the 'bcb' command, > > I can resolve the above minor nit-picks in my next iteration of the > > 'bcb' command, freeing you from any more work for this patch. > > > > Thanks, Eugeniu. Please make it so. Basically, for this patch the main > change is typedefs removal. Once you send v2 for BCB, I can try and > implement reboot reason on TI X15 board by using it, and Igor will be > unblocked w.r.t. A/B patches.
Agreed. I will submit the next revision beginning of next week. But just to be clear, I don't think anybody is blocked by me and should be able to continue his local efforts to address review comments and polish any pending A/B patches. The changes in my series will be non-functional (except for the typedef removal in the header). There will be no added/removed features in the 'bcb' command and it can already be used locally to read the boot reason and act accordingly as explained in my pseudo-code example. Thanks for cooperation. > > -- > > Best regards, > > Eugeniu. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot