Hi Simon,
I will reply for the serie
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 07:00, Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delau...@st.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I create this v2 serie with:
> >
> > 1/ documentation update for previous patch
> > [U-Boot,v2] dm: remove pre reloc properties in SPL and TPL device tree
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1081155/
> >
> > PS: Code is already merged in commit commit c7a88dae997f ("dm: remove
> > pre reloc properties in SPL and TPL device tree")
> > but not the documentation.
> >
> > 2/ missing part for (patch 1/2)
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=89846
> >
> > 3/ new tests for pre-reloc propertie in SPL as suggested by Simon
> > (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1081155/#2156621)
> >
> > Tell me if is better to split the serie.
>
> Somehow this cover letter appears in a patch, hence some of my confusion. I
> see
> what you are doing and it is a comprehensive approach.
>
> But please see my comments about comparing the .dtb file instead of making
> sandbox print it out.
I will change the test to only compare the device tree : it is more simple.
=> v3 in few days
My first approach was complicated but it is to allow
- check if sandbox SPL with devicetree and libfdt in working as is already done
for platdata
- check if sandbox SPL can start U-Boot in booth case
(by executing the simple test_000_version in ./py/tests/test_000_version.py)
- split test and normal device tree (I move the "spl-tests" nodes in test.dts)
But it is too complicated just the purpose of this test.
NB: the executable "u-boot-spl" for sandbox_spl_defconfig already
include the devicetree information, with platdata.
> Regards,
> Simon
Regards
Patrick
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
