Hi Tom,
On 27.05.19 20:35, Tom Rini wrote:
It's release day and here is v2019.07-rc3. I think I have a few
outstanding regression fixes to pull in still, and then of course
Kconfig migrations.
So, what are we doing about DM migration deadlines? Well, first, let me
say again, that DM is not required for SPL. This comes up enough that I
want to say it again here. Next, if there is active progress on
converting things, we'll keep from pulling the code out. This is why
for example, we haven't yet pulled out a lot of deprecated SPI code.
Some of it is still in progress on being converted, so I need to update
the series I posted after the last -rc to remove still less drivers.
In terms of a changelog,
git log --merges v2019.07-rc2..v2019.07-rc3
continues to improve in quality. If you're sending me a PR, please
include a few lines or words in summary and I'll be sure to put it into
the merge commit.
As this cycle is coming closer to an end, I feel it's time to ask. Is
anyone out there being more frustrated with a 3 month release cycle than
with a 2 month cycle? I feel like the answer is that the 3 month cycle
is working better than 2 and we should keep that going.
I personally favor the 2 months release cycle. My main (mostly practical)
reason being here, that I don't have to queue non-fixes patches that long
and can push them upstream more frequently / sooner.
But I can also live with the 3 month release cycle, so if the majority
prefers this, then lets stick with it.
Thanks,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
