śr., 29 maj 2019 o 03:55 David Lechner <da...@lechnology.com> napisał(a): > > On 5/28/19 8:52 PM, Adam Ford wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 7:03 PM David Lechner <da...@lechnology.com> wrote: > >> > >> This adds a define for CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT in the legoev3 config. > >> On the EV3, U-Boot is loaded into RAM by another bootloader, so we > >> don't need the lowlevel init in U-Boot. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <da...@lechnology.com> > >> --- > >> include/configs/legoev3.h | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/include/configs/legoev3.h b/include/configs/legoev3.h > >> index 1e239ecadd..36ca3b201e 100644 > >> --- a/include/configs/legoev3.h > >> +++ b/include/configs/legoev3.h > >> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > >> #define CONFIG_SYS_OSCIN_FREQ 24000000 > >> #define CONFIG_SYS_TIMERBASE DAVINCI_TIMER0_BASE > >> #define CONFIG_SYS_HZ_CLOCK clk_get(DAVINCI_AUXCLK_CLKID) > >> +#define CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT > > > > If that's the case, does this mean that the NAK'd patch from Bartosz > > removing the dead code can be accepted? > > Probably
I will resend the two patches in a single series to avoid confusion. Bart _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot