On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 02:26:54AM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> So far we are required to always define the CONFIG_SYS_MMC_ENV_DEV
> variable, even if a platform specific function overrides the weak
> function that is using it.
> 
> Check for the existence of this Kconfig variable, eliminating the need
> to define a dummy value.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
> ---
>  env/mmc.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/env/mmc.c b/env/mmc.c
> index c3cf35d01b..122fec3af8 100644
> --- a/env/mmc.c
> +++ b/env/mmc.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,11 @@ __weak int mmc_get_env_addr(struct mmc *mmc, int copy, 
> u32 *env_addr)
>  
>  __weak int mmc_get_env_dev(void)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_MMC_ENV_DEV
>       return CONFIG_SYS_MMC_ENV_DEV;
> +#else
> +     return 0;
> +#endif
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_MMC_ENV_PART

Since 0 is a valid device, I'm concerned this might lead to unintended
behavior.  Can we return some error code here and catch it later?

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to