> I'd like to review this, but maybe you can help me speed up the process and > tell > us if the move has been a 1:1 code move or if you had to adapt things to the > new > location (other than the function being renamed)?
print_decomp_msg() is a 1:1 move. bootm_decomp_image() is mostly 1:1 move, except that I changed the return code for unimplemented compression type (from BOOTM_ERR_UNIMPLEMENTED to -ENOSYS) and removed the call to handle_decomp_error() (handle_decomp_error() is specific to the BOOTM_ERR error types which are only used within bootm.c, so I decoupled it from image_decomp() and made all the call sites in bootm.c call it explicitly). _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
