> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/5] imx: add i.MX6ULZ board > > Hi Peng, > Hi Fabio, > > On 06.09.19 09:43, Peng Fan wrote: > >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/5] imx: add i.MX6ULZ board > >> > >> Hi Stefan, > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:59 AM Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote: > >> > >>> a) > >>> Why is SPL not used in the mainline i.MX6ULL/ULZ port? The i.MX6UL > >>> (14x14) does use SPL. > >> > >> Yes, I think it could SPL as well. Maybe Peng can comment. > > > > NXP vendor tree not support SPL, so when I upstream the code, SPL was > > not included. > > I see. Thanks for the update here. I might work on SPL support, if this seems > necessary for my custom i.MX6ULZ board. > > I do have another question though. I'm currently testing QSPI booting on the > i.MX6ULL EVK. And this does not work 100% reliably. Sometimes the board > boots after programming of the IMX image to 0x1000 in QSPI NOR to the > U-Boot prompt. And sometimes I see no output at all. I do have the QSPI > binary programmed at 0x400. BTW, these binaries boot all just fine when > booted via the "imx_usb" loader. Only when booted directly from QSPI (DIP > switches) it fails sometimes. > > Is this a known problem?
I not heard such issue from our internal test. > > Do you have a reference U-Boot binary for QSPI booting for the i.MX6ULL EVK? > Best would be including the QSPI header (offset 0x400). Have you ever tried mfgtool? I do not have such image. Regards, Peng. > > Thanks, > Stefan _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot