On 10/9/19 10:36 AM, Fabien Dessenne wrote:
> The .is_running() ops expects a return value of 0 if the processor is
> running, 1 if not running : align to this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.desse...@st.com>
This patch should be earlier than patch4, right?
Reviewed-by: Suman Anna <s-a...@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c
> index eef3416..fce9653 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c
> @@ -237,14 +237,14 @@ static int stm32_copro_stop(struct udevice *dev)
> /**
> * stm32_copro_is_running() - Is the STM32 remote processor running
> * @dev: corresponding STM32 remote processor device
> - * @return 1 if the remote processor is running, 0 otherwise
> + * @return 0 if the remote processor is running, 1 otherwise
> */
> static int stm32_copro_is_running(struct udevice *dev)
> {
> struct stm32_copro_privdata *priv;
>
> priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
> - return priv->is_running;
> + return !priv->is_running;
> }
>
> static const struct dm_rproc_ops stm32_copro_ops = {
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
