Dear Heiko Schocher, In message <4c343ae3.7060...@denx.de> you wrote: > > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_TSEC1 > >> +#define CONFIG_HAS_ETH0 > >> +#define CONFIG_TSEC1_NAME "TSEC0" > > > > Oops? This is TSEC1, so why do you name it "TSEC0" ? > > Because this is so in all other board configs I looked. > > Kim? Can you comment this? > (I think it is because to be in sync with "eth0" ...)
That is not a good reason to confuse the users. TSEC0 and TSEC1 are different interfaces, and to bend names is definitely a bad idea. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de The trouble with our times is that the future is not what it used to be. - Paul Valery _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot