On 22/10/2019 01:47, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 03:57, Matthias Brugger <matthias....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Simon, >> >> On 05/09/2019 10:48, matthias....@kernel.org wrote: >>> From: Matthias Brugger <mbrug...@suse.com> >>> >>> The libftd implementation of U-Boot is outdated with the >>> upstream project. Especially the default number of size-cells >>> was wrong. This series fixes this by backporting the corresponding >>> patches from the upstream project. >>> >>> Changes since v1: >>> - fix spelling of U-Boot (patch 1 + 2 /4) >>> - add Reviewed-by tag (patch 1/4) >>> - fix the case of size-cells == 0 (patch 3/4) >>> - fix default address cells for livetree (patch 4/4) >>> >>> v1 can be found here: >>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1137331/ >>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1137330/ >>> >>> >>> Matthias Brugger (4): >>> libfdt: fdt_address_cells() and fdt_size_cells() >>> libfdt: return correct value if #size-cells property is not present >>> libfdt: Allow #size-cells of 0 >>> dm: Fix default address cells return value >>> >>> include/dm/of.h | 2 +- >>> scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt_addresses.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++-------------- >>> scripts/dtc/libfdt/libfdt.h | 2 +- >>> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) >>> >> >> Any comments on this? I tried to find your custodian tree, but wasn't able >> to do >> so and check if you took it already. > > This was applied. Did you not get the emails on each patch? >
I got emails saying that they were applied to u-boot-dm/next, but wasn't able to find that branch. Seeing it now, not sure if I didn't look correctly. Anyway thank for merging these fixes. Regards, Matthias _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot