On 11/7/19 4:31 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:49 AM Marek Vasut wrote:
>>
>> On 11/7/19 3:10 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi
>>> index 322c858c4b..d55460755f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga-common-u-boot.dtsi
>>> @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
>>> };
>>> };
>>>
>>> +&clkmgr {
>>> + u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> &rst {
>>> u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;
>>> };
>>> @@ -17,3 +21,7 @@
>>> &sdr {
>>> u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;
>>> };
>>> +
>>> +&sysmgr {
>>> + u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;
>>> +};
>>
>> Gen5 doesn't have any clock driver, so does it really make sense to
>> retain the clkmgr node in SPL now ? Seems like this only grows the SPL
>> size with no benefit.
>>
> But, we need to get clkmgr base address from DT even we don't have
> clock driver for it.
> So, clkmgr needs enable in SPL.
Ah, I see, thanks for clarifying.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
