Hi Segar Kadam, On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:59 AM Sagar Kadam <sagar.ka...@sifive.com> wrote: > > > Hello Jagan/Bin, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: U-Boot <u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de> On Behalf Of Bin Meng > > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2019 8:02 PM > > To: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt ( Sifive) <pal...@sifive.com>; U-Boot Mailing List <u- > > b...@lists.denx.de>; linux-amarula <linux-amar...@amarulasolutions.com> > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/5] sifive: fu540: Enable spi-nor flash > > support > > > > Hi Jagan, > > > > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 7:57 PM Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Bin, > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 3:50 PM Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Jagan, > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 5:38 PM Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jagan, > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:58 PM Jagan Teki > > <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > HiFive Unleashed A00 support is25wp256 spi-nor flash, > > > > > > So enable the same and add test result log for future > > > > > > reference. > > > > > > > > > > > > Tested on SiFive FU540 board. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > > > > > > Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > .../dts/hifive-unleashed-a00-u-boot.dtsi | 1 + > > > > > > board/sifive/fu540/Kconfig | 3 +++ > > > > > > doc/board/sifive/fu540.rst | 19 > > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/dts/hifive-unleashed-a00-u-boot.dtsi > > b/arch/riscv/dts/hifive-unleashed-a00-u-boot.dtsi > > > > > > index 25ec8265a5..d7a64134db 100644 > > > > > > --- a/arch/riscv/dts/hifive-unleashed-a00-u-boot.dtsi > > > > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/dts/hifive-unleashed-a00-u-boot.dtsi > > > > > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ > > > > > > > > > > > > / { > > > > > > aliases { > > > > > > + spi0 = &qspi0; > > > > > > spi2 = &qspi2; > > > > > > }; > > > > > > }; > > > > > > diff --git a/board/sifive/fu540/Kconfig b/board/sifive/fu540/Kconfig > > > > > > index 5d65080429..c5a1bca03c 100644 > > > > > > --- a/board/sifive/fu540/Kconfig > > > > > > +++ b/board/sifive/fu540/Kconfig > > > > > > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy > > > > > > imply CMD_FS_GENERIC > > > > > > imply CMD_NET > > > > > > imply CMD_PING > > > > > > + imply CMD_SF > > > > > > imply CLK_SIFIVE > > > > > > imply CLK_SIFIVE_FU540_PRCI > > > > > > imply DOS_PARTITION > > > > > > @@ -40,6 +41,8 @@ config BOARD_SPECIFIC_OPTIONS # dummy > > > > > > imply SIFIVE_SERIAL > > > > > > imply SPI > > > > > > imply SPI_SIFIVE > > > > > > + imply SPI_FLASH > > > > > > + imply SPI_FLASH_ISSI > > > > > > imply MMC > > > > > > imply MMC_SPI > > > > > > imply MMC_BROKEN_CD > > > > > > diff --git a/doc/board/sifive/fu540.rst b/doc/board/sifive/fu540.rst > > > > > > index 91b94ee06f..2e70cad02e 100644 > > > > > > --- a/doc/board/sifive/fu540.rst > > > > > > +++ b/doc/board/sifive/fu540.rst > > > > > > @@ -366,3 +366,22 @@ load uImage. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please press Enter to activate this console. > > > > > > / # > > > > > > + > > > > > > +Sample spi nor flash test > > > > > > +------------------------- > > > > > > + > > > > > > +.. code-block:: none > > > > > > + > > > > > > + => sf probe 0:2 > > > > > > > > > > The cs number can't be 2. It should be zero. > > > > > > > > With this patch series, we got crazy duplicated flash devices created, > > > > see below: > > > > > > > > => sf probe > > > > unrecognized JEDEC id bytes: ff, ff, ff > > > > Failed to initialize SPI flash at 0:0 (error -2) > > > > => sf probe 0:2 > > > > SF: Detected is25wp256 with page size 256 Bytes, erase size 4 KiB, > > > > total 32 > > MiB > > > > => sf probe 0:4 > > > > SF: Detected is25wp256 with page size 256 Bytes, erase size 4 KiB, > > > > total 32 > > MiB > > > > => sf probe 0:6 > > > > SF: Detected is25wp256 with page size 256 Bytes, erase size 4 KiB, > > > > total 32 > > MiB > > > > => dm tree > > > > Class Index Probed Driver Name > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > root 0 [ + ] root_driver root_driver > > > > simple_bus 0 [ + ] generic_simple_bus |-- soc > > > > clk 0 [ + ] sifive-fu540-prci | |-- > > > > clock-controller@10000000 > > > > serial 0 [ + ] serial_sifive | |-- serial@10010000 > > > > serial 1 [ ] serial_sifive | |-- serial@10011000 > > > > spi 0 [ + ] sifive_spi | |-- spi@10040000 > > > > spi_flash 0 [ ] spi_flash_std | | |-- flash@0 > > > > spi_flash 1 [ + ] spi_flash_std | | |-- > > > > spi_flash@0:2 > > > > spi_flash 2 [ + ] spi_flash_std | | |-- > > > > spi_flash@0:4 > > > > spi_flash 3 [ + ] spi_flash_std | | `-- > > > > spi_flash@0:6 > > > > > > > > With my patch series below > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=129736 > > > > > > > > the CS number check was added to the SPI flash hence we got: > > > > > > > > => sf probe > > > > unrecognized JEDEC id bytes: ff, ff, ff > > > > Failed to initialize SPI flash at 0:0 (error -2) > > > > => sf probe 2 > > > > Invalid cs 2 (err=-22) > > > > Invalid cs 2 (err=-22) > > > > Invalid chip select 0:2 (err=-22) > > > > Failed to initialize SPI flash at 0:2 (error -22) > > > > => sf probe 4 > > > > Invalid cs 4 (err=-22) > > > > Invalid cs 4 (err=-22) > > > > Invalid chip select 0:4 (err=-22) > > > > Failed to initialize SPI flash at 0:4 (error -22) > > > > > > > > So we still need figure out why CS number 0 cannot work on SiFive. > > > > > > The existing quad wire that driver pushing for flash seems not > > > detecting flash at CS 0 so making cr to single wire detecting flash at > > > > I vaguely remember someone from SiFive posted a patch that forced the > > SPI controller to work under single wire mode. Maybe someone from > > SiFive could help explain the weird behavior as you mentioned. > > > Sorry, I had not been closely looking into this thread. > Yes, the initial patch posted was to add support for is25wp256 device. > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1146523/ > but it seems it was bricking the board, and later couldn't follow-up on this. > IIUC, spi_nor_scan has default reg_proto set to 1_1_1, and further parses > slave mode and accordingly sets the hwcaps fields. Now since the device tree > set's the slave mode to 4 bit mode based on the tx-bus-width, this creates > a conflict due to which reg_read fails and so the sf probe fails too.
The strange thing is that the 'sf probe' only fails at CS 0, but succeeds at CS 2/4/6/8/... Is this strange behavior caused by the default reg_proto set to 1_1_1 in spi_nor_scan()? > Now forcing the SPI-controller in single wire mode helped the sf probe to > detect the flash. Alternatively I think if we use bitlen passed by > spi_mem_exec_op > and prepare spi transfer's in controller based on max of t->rx_nbits, > t->tx_nbits as > done in linux driver this should work. Any thoughts on this? > Maybe Jagan can comment this. Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot