William C. Landolina wrote: > What is the status of this patch for getting MCI working on SAM9 CPUs? I am > working on a new AT91SAM9G45 board and would like to incorporate it if it is > ready for prime time. It is not clear to me who should be signing off on > this patch and if they have done so. > The Patch is ready and working for 9260/9XE, I signed it off. Next step is for Eric(Hong) Xu to add it to the at91 custodian git, and finally it to be pulled into mainstream. > If there is work to be done on this and I could help, please let me know. I > intend to submit the patches to get my 9G45 board mainlined and this might be > a good way for me to start learning the intricacies of making and submitting > a proper patch. > For other than 9260/9XE SoCs it should work fine, maybe some defines have to be added to their <at91xxxxx.h> header files, you'll find that out if you try to use ATMEL_MCI there. > Any suggestions will be appreciated. > Soon I will be working on support for more than 4 GB cards.
Reinhard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
