On 12/9/19 9:59 AM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 01:25:27AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/28/19 8:20 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/27/19 8:45 PM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 07:31:39PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/24/19 9:11 PM, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
Currently the only way to run an EFI binary like GRUB2 is via the
'bootefi' command, which cannot be used in a verified boot scenario.

The obvious solution to this limitation is to add support for
booting FIT images containing those EFI binaries.

The implementation relies on a new image type - IH_OS_EFI - which
can be created by using 'os = "efi"' inside an ITS file:

/ {
       #address-cells = <1>;

       images {
           efi-grub {
               description = "GRUB EFI";
               data = /incbin/("EFI/BOOT/bootarm.efi");
               type = "kernel_noload";
               arch = "arm";
               os = "efi";
               compression = "none";
               load = <0x0>;
               entry = <0x0>;
               hash-1 {
                   algo = "sha256";
               };
           };
       };

       configurations {
           default = "config-grub";
           config-grub {
               kernel = "efi-grub";
               signature-1 {
                   algo = "sha256,rsa2048";
                   sign-images = "kernel";
               };
           };
       };
};

The bootm command has been extended to handle the IH_OS_EFI images.
To enable this feature, a new configuration option has been added:
BOOTM_EFI

I tested the solution using the 'qemu_arm' board:

=> load scsi 0:1 ${kernel_addr_r} efi-image.fit
=> bootm ${kernel_addr_r}#config-grub

Thanks a lot for the patch series which makes good sense to me.

I think we should pass addresses and not strings to cmd/bootefi.c. This
will need a bit of refactoring as already addressed in a comment to
patch 2/2.

Additionally the documentation in doc/uefi/u-boot_on_efi.rst and
doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt should be updated.

I cc the contributors given by
scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f common/bootm_os.c

Best regards

Heinrich


Thanks for the feedback, Heinrich!

Instead of creating new function(s), I think we could simply extend
    int do_bootefi_image(const char *image_opt)
with a new parameter to hold the fdt address and move here the call
to 'efi_install_fdt()', which is now performed by 'do_bootefi()'.

efi_install_fdt() has to be called for the 'bootefi bootmgr' command too
so the refactoring is a bit more complicated. I have started on that.

The first step is to change efi_install_fdt() to expect the argument as
address instead of a string.

https://github.com/xypron/u-boot-patches/blob/efi-next/0001-efi_loader-pass-address-to-efi_install_fdt.patch


fdt_addr==NULL indicates no device tree supplied by user.

Best regards

Heinrich


However, I'm not sure about changing the data types, i.e. from
'char *' to ulong, for the following reasons:
1. image_opt may have a different meaning in addition to efi address
2. fdt address may not be provided, so we need somehow to detect an >> invalid 
value

Kind regards,
Cristian


Hello Christian,

patch series
efi_loader: prepare for FIT images
https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-December/393192.html
is now available. It offers these functions:

/* Install device tree */
efi_status_t efi_install_fdt(uintptr_t fdt_addr);
/* Run loaded UEFI image */
efi_status_t efi_run_image(void *source_buffer, efi_uintn_t source_size);

Could you, please, rebase your patches on this patch series.

Please, call efi_install_fdt with EFI_FDT_USE_INTERNAL if no device tree
is supplied by the FIT image.

The patch series is also available in branch efi-2020-04 at
https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi.git

Best regards

Heinrich

Hello Heinrich,

Thanks for the patch series!
I will send the updated patches by latest tomorrow EOD.

You also mentioned updating the documentation in
doc/uefi/u-boot_on_efi.rst and doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt.

I've checked those documents and their content is quite generic,
not particularly related to this work. The former describes
how to build and run u-boot as an EFI application/payload, while
the later shows how to build and use FIT images.

If you agree, I could instead add a new ITS file in uImage.FIT folder
and describe there the new functionality.

Having an example in uImage.Fit will be very helpful. But I still think
the capability to start UEFI binaries via FIT images should be mentioned
in the documentation. Just add a section after "Executing a UEFI binary"
in doc/uefi/uefi.rst, e.g.

Launching a UEFI binary from a FIT image
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A signed FIT image can be used to securely boot a UEFI image via the
bootm command. A sample configuration is provided as file
doc/uImage.FIT/uefi.its. See doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt for an
introduction to FIT images.

Best regards

Heinrich


Kind regards,
Cristian



Reply via email to