Hi Lukasz,

On 07.01.2020 11:57, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
Hi Stefan,

This patch adds support for SAMSUNG's ARM Cortex-A9 based S5P4418
SoC, especially FriendlyARM's NanoPi2 and NanoPC-T2 boards. It is
based on https://github.com/friendlyarm/u-boot/tree/nanopi2-v2016.01.
For v2016.01 I have also made a working SPL (FriendlyARM U-Boot is
using a closed source 2nd-bootloader). My plan is to migrate this
also to the current U-Boot.

Is this somewhat related to Nexell's S5P6818 soc?

There were some patches [1] posted for U-Boot.

Yes, I think the S5P6818 is a follow-up of the S5P4418. Is it planed to
include those patches into U-Boot master? Or is there a branch where those patches are already included so I can have a look at it and to be able to
use those patches where possible?

For the closed source 2nd bootloader - there are some alternatives on
the Internet with a source code [2], [3].

Thanks a lot for the links. I did some research on this subject but I have not
found any source code for the S5P4418 2ndBootloader. Unfortunately, the
S5P6818 2ndBootloader is not of much use because the initialization of the
DDR-Ram Controller is different. So I will have a lock at  [3].


Issues:
Please send me a value for "#define MACH_TYPE_S5P4418" for
arch/arm/include/asm/mach-types.h.

I think that non-dt device is a no go nowadays... (as we do strive to
switch to DTS as much as possible in U-Boot now).

See my reply to Tom Rini.

The size of the patch is over 700kB, so I will upload it on
http://www.denx.de/wiki/attach/U-Boot/TooBigPatches if not otherwise
instructed.



Links:

[1] -
https:https://github.com/metro94/s5p6818_bootloader//patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/842828/
[2] - https://github.com/metro94/s5p6818_bootloader
[3] - https://github.com/NexellCorp/bl1_s5p4418

Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lu...@denx.de

Regards,
Stefan Bosch

Reply via email to