On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:20 PM Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com> > >Sent: 24 January 2020 12:21 > >To: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> > >Cc: U-Boot-Denx <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; Atish Patra > ><atish.pa...@wdc.com>; palmerdabb...@google.com; Bin Meng > ><bmeng...@gmail.com>; Paul Walmsley ( Sifive) > ><paul.walms...@sifive.com>; Troy Benjegerdes ( Sifive) > ><troy.benjeger...@sifive.com>; Anup Patel <anup.pa...@wdc.com>; Sagar > >Kadam <sagar.ka...@sifive.com> > >Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] configs: fu540: Add config file for U-boot SPL > > > >On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:21 AM Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> > >wrote: > >> > >> With sifive_fu540_spl_defconfig: > >> > >> U-Boot SPL will be loaded by ZSBL from SD card (replace fsbl.bin with > >> u-boot-spl.bin) and runs in L2 LIM in machine mode and then load FIT > >> image u-boot.itb from 1st partition of SD card (replace fw_payload.bin > >> with u-boot.itb) into RAM. > >> > >> U-boot SPL expects u-boot.itb FIT image in the 1st partition of SD > >> card irrespective of GUID > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.pa...@sifive.com> > >> --- > > > >I'm thinking we don't need any separate config for SPL. Say if we have single > >config that creates both SPL and U-Boot proper and give feasibility to the > >user > >to use > >1) SPL + U-Boot proper > >2) SiFive SPL + U-Boot proper > > Sifive SPL ?
I think what Jagan meant was: 1) U-Boot SPL + OpenSBI FW_DYNAMIC + U-Boot proper 2) FSBL + OpenSBI FW_PAYLOAD + U-Boot proper So "SiFive SPL" is actually "FSBL" Regards, Anup
