Hi Simon,

On 5/3/20 10:54, Walter Lozano wrote:
Let me check if I understand correctly, your suggestion is to do something like diff --git a/include/dm/uclass.h b/include/dm/uclass.h index 92c07f8426..bf09dadf3f 100644 --- a/include/dm/uclass.h +++ b/include/dm/uclass.h

@@ -167,8 +167,8 @@ int uclass_get_device(enum uclass_id id, int index, struct udevice **devp);

 int uclass_get_device_by_name(enum uclass_id id, const char *name,                               struct udevice **devp); -int uclass_get_device_by_platdata(enum uclass_id id, void *platdata, -                             struct udevice **devp);

+int uclass_get_device_by_struct(enum uclass_id id, enum dm_struct_t struct_id, +                             void *struct_pointer, struct udevice **devp);  /**   * uclass_get_device_by_seq() - Get a uclass device based on an ID and sequence   *

If that is the case, I would be happy to help.

Also, if my understanding is correct, could you elaborate which cases are you trying to cover with this approach?

Sorry, it looks like the last part of the email test got screw.

If I understand correctly, your suggestion is to change

diff --git a/include/dm/uclass.h b/include/dm/uclass.h
index 92c07f8426..bf09dadf3f 100644
--- a/include/dm/uclass.h
+++ b/include/dm/uclass.h
@@ -167,8 +167,8 @@ int uclass_get_device(enum uclass_id id, int index, struct 
udevice **devp);
 int uclass_get_device_by_name(enum uclass_id id, const char *name,
                              struct udevice **devp);
-int uclass_get_device_by_platdata(enum uclass_id id, void *platdata,
-                             struct udevice **devp);
+int uclass_get_device_by_struct(enum uclass_id id, enum dm_struct_t , 
struct_id,
+                             void *struct_pointer, struct udevice **devp);
 /**
  * uclass_get_device_by_seq() - Get a uclass device based on an ID and sequence
  *

If that is the case, I would be happy to help.

Also, if my understanding is correct, could you elaborate which cases
are trying to cover with this approach?

Regards,

Walter

Reply via email to