On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 11:58:39 -0400 Ben Gardiner <bengardi...@nanometrics.ca> wrote:
> This patch adds a new 'mtdparts add' variant: add.e (with a synomym add.i). Why multiple ways to say the same thing, in a new command with no legacy to be compatible with? Even on the commands where .e and .i used to do something, that's now the default, and the suffix is unnecessary. So I don't see any need to mimic the syntax. What do "e" and "i" even stand for? It looks like they were "for compatibility with older units" even when first committed. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
