On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 05:28:59PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > one more thing: > > On Monday 09 August 2010 17:46:03 Philippe De Muyter wrote: > > Here is the excerpt from the errata : > > > > Workaround: If the interval between 60h and its subsequent command > > can be guaranteed within 20μs, Option I is recommended, > > otherwise Option II (involves hardware) should be selected. > > Option I: The table below lists the detail command sequences: > > Command > > Data bus Address bus Remarks > > Sequence > > 1 90h Block Address > > Read Lock Status > > 2 Read Block Address + 02h > > (2)(3) (1) > > 3 60h Block Address > > (2)(3) (1) Lock/Unlock/RCR > > Configuration 4 D0h/01h/03h Block Address > > Notes: > > (1) Block Address refers to RCR configuration data only when the 60h > > command sequence is used to set RCR register combined with 03h > > subsequent command. > > (2) For the third and fourth command sequences, the Block Address must > > be the same. > > (3) The interval between 60h command and its subsequent D0h/01h/2Fh/03h > > commands should be less than 20μs. > > Please add this workaround text from the errata to the commit text in your > next patch version. This makes things easier - no need to search for the > errata.
OK Philippe _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot