Hi Simon,

On 6/4/20 00:42, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Walter

On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 at 21:32, Walter Lozano<walter.loz...@collabora.com>  wrote:
All of these commits need a commit message please.

Thank you for pointing it.

Signed-off-by: Walter Lozano<walter.loz...@collabora.com>
---
  drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: SImon Glass<s...@chromium.org>

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c
index 761a4b46e9..049a1b6ea8 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c
@@ -1379,41 +1379,20 @@ __weak void init_clk_usdhc(u32 index)
  {
  }

-static int fsl_esdhc_probe(struct udevice *dev)
-{
-       struct mmc_uclass_priv *upriv = dev_get_uclass_priv(dev);
-       struct fsl_esdhc_plat *plat = dev_get_platdata(dev);
-       struct fsl_esdhc_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
+static int fsl_esdhc_ofdata_to_platdata(struct udevice *dev){
+
  #if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA)
-       const void *fdt = gd->fdt_blob;
-       int node = dev_of_offset(dev);
-       fdt_addr_t addr;
-#else
-       struct dtd_fsl_imx6q_usdhc *dtplat = &plat->dtplat;
-#endif
-       struct esdhc_soc_data *data =
-               (struct esdhc_soc_data *)dev_get_driver_data(dev);
+       struct fsl_esdhc_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
  #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_REGULATOR)
         struct udevice *vqmmc_dev;
+       int ret;
  #endif
+       const void *fdt = gd->fdt_blob;
+       int node = dev_of_offset(dev);
+
+       fdt_addr_t addr;
         unsigned int val;
-       struct mmc *mmc;
-#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(BLK)
-       struct blk_desc *bdesc;
-#endif
-       int ret;

-#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA)
-       priv->esdhc_regs = map_sysmem(dtplat->reg[0], dtplat->reg[1]);
-       val = plat->dtplat.bus_width;
-       if (val == 8)
-               priv->bus_width = 8;
-       else if (val == 4)
-               priv->bus_width = 4;
-       else
-               priv->bus_width = 1;
-       priv->non_removable = 1;
-#else
         addr = dev_read_addr(dev);
         if (addr == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE)
                 return -EINVAL;
@@ -1483,8 +1462,40 @@ static int fsl_esdhc_probe(struct udevice *dev)
         }
  #endif
  #endif
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int fsl_esdhc_probe(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+       struct mmc_uclass_priv *upriv = dev_get_uclass_priv(dev);
+       struct fsl_esdhc_plat *plat = dev_get_platdata(dev);
+       struct fsl_esdhc_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
+       struct esdhc_soc_data *data =
+               (struct esdhc_soc_data *)dev_get_driver_data(dev);
+       struct mmc *mmc;
+#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(BLK)
Should not need to support !BLK now. The migration date has passed.

Thanks.

+       struct blk_desc *bdesc;
+#endif
+       int ret;
+
+#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_PLATDATA)
+       struct dtd_fsl_imx6q_usdhc *dtplat = &plat->dtplat;
+       unsigned int val;
+
+       priv->esdhc_regs = map_sysmem(dtplat->reg[0], dtplat->reg[1]);
+       val = plat->dtplat.bus_width;
+       if (val == 8)
+               priv->bus_width = 8;
+       else if (val == 4)
+               priv->bus_width = 4;
+       else
+               priv->bus_width = 1;
+       priv->non_removable = 1;
+#endif
+
         if (data)
                 priv->flags = data->flags;
+
         /*
          * TODO:
          * Because lack of clk driver, if SDHC clk is not enabled,
@@ -1664,6 +1675,7 @@ U_BOOT_DRIVER(fsl_esdhc) = {
         .name   = "fsl-esdhc-mmc",
         .id     = UCLASS_MMC,
         .of_match = fsl_esdhc_ids,
+       .ofdata_to_platdata = fsl_esdhc_ofdata_to_platdata,
         .ops    = &fsl_esdhc_ops,
  #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(BLK)
         .bind   = fsl_esdhc_bind,
@@ -1677,6 +1689,7 @@ U_BOOT_DRIVER(fsl_esdhc) = {
  U_BOOT_DRIVER(fsl_usdhc) = {
         .name   = "fsl_imx6q_usdhc",
         .id     = UCLASS_MMC,
+       .ofdata_to_platdata = fsl_esdhc_ofdata_to_platdata,
         .ops    = &fsl_esdhc_ops,
  #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(BLK)
         .bind   = fsl_esdhc_bind,
--
2.20.1

Regards,
Simon

Reply via email to