On 4/15/20 2:26 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 10:32, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/14/20 4:41 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Marek,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2020 at 07:41, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/14/20 3:26 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 02:24:18PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/14/20 5:03 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:17:16AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/14/20 1:27 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 08:54:49PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The most basic printf("%i", value) formating string was missing,
>>>>>>>>>> add it for the sake of convenience.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
>>>>>>>>>> Cc: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> lib/tiny-printf.c | 3 ++-
>>>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/tiny-printf.c b/lib/tiny-printf.c
>>>>>>>>>> index 1138c7012a..8fc7e48d99 100644
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/lib/tiny-printf.c
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/tiny-printf.c
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ static int _vprintf(struct printf_info *info,
>>>>>>>>>> const char *fmt, va_list va)
>>>>>>>>>> goto abort;
>>>>>>>>>> case 'u':
>>>>>>>>>> case 'd':
>>>>>>>>>> + case 'i':
>>>>>>>>>> div = 1000000000;
>>>>>>>>>> if (islong) {
>>>>>>>>>> num = va_arg(va, unsigned
>>>>>>>>>> long);
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -251,7 +252,7 @@ static int _vprintf(struct printf_info *info,
>>>>>>>>>> const char *fmt, va_list va)
>>>>>>>>>> num = va_arg(va, unsigned
>>>>>>>>>> int);
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - if (ch == 'd') {
>>>>>>>>>> + if (ch != 'u') {
>>>>>>>>>> if (islong && (long)num <
>>>>>>>>>> 0) {
>>>>>>>>>> num = -(long)num;
>>>>>>>>>> out(info, '-');
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How much does the size change and where do we see this as a problem?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any code which uses %i in SPL just misbehaves, e.g.
>>>>>>>> printf("%s[%i] value=%x", __func__, __LINE__, val);
>>>>>>>> prints function name and then incorrect value, because %i is ignored.
>>>>>>>> This is also documented in the commit message.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> U-Boot grows in size massively due to all the DM/DT bloat which is
>>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>>> forced upon everyone, but there the uncontrolled growth is apparently
>>>>>>>> OK
>>>>>>>> even if it brings no obvious improvement, rather the opposite. And yet
>>>>>>>> here, size increase suddenly matters? Sorry, that's not right.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The code grows by 6 bytes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, it matters for _tiny-printf_ as that's where we have little to no
>>>>>>> room for growth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many systems that use tiny-printf in SPL are also forced to use DM
>>>>>> in SPL ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know how many times I've said no one is forced to switch to DM
>>>>> in SPL.
>>>>
>>>> This is beside the point, there are boards which use SPL and DM, because
>>>> the non-DM drivers are steadily going away. So the growth in SPL size is
>>>> there, either directly or as a side-effect.
>>>
>>> I think this is a good point. For serial we have a debug UART. I am
>>> think it would be useful to have a 'simple bypass' for more
>>> subsystems. For example, for I2C we could have a simple option to
>>> access a single I2C driver directly, bypassing driver model. Of course
>>> this is painful to do before we have completed I2C migration.
>>
>> Right. Although it could be prototyped e.g. on the UART subssystem,
>> which is a good candidate.
>
> Yes it is on my mind, once i get my lab working properly. Will have a
> think about it...
Thanks. This is long overdue to be implemented.
