Le 18/08/2010 18:46, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Le 14/08/2010 19:42, Mike Frysinger a écrit : >>> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>>> Le 14/08/2010 10:25, Mike Frysinger a écrit : >>>>>> int print_buffer (ulong addr, void* data, uint width, uint count, uint >>>>>> linelen) >>>>>> { >>>>>> - uint8_t linebuf[MAX_LINE_LENGTH_BYTES + 1]; >>>>>> + uint8_t linebuf[MAX_LINE_LENGTH_BYTES + 1] >>>>>> + __attribute__((__aligned__(sizeof(uint32_t)))); >>>>> >>>>> __aligned(sizeof(uint32_t)) >>>> >>>> I based the __aligned__ on what's in post/cpu/ppc4xx/cache.c. What is the >>>> difference between __aligned and __aligned__? >>> >>> i dont mean "__attribute__((__aligned(sizeof(uint32_t))))", i mean >>> "__aligned(sizeof(uint32_t))". the linux compiler headers take care >>> of expanding it to an attribute. >> >> The __aligned(...) syntax fails to compile with the ELDK 4.2 arm toolchain. > > you need to include linux/compiler.h first ... but i would have > thought this be a header already included globally. maybe that's a > new topic to start. > -mike
I don't understand why I should introduce a dependency on linux. What is the benefit? Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot