Hi Simon, -----"Simon Glass" <s...@chromium.org> schrieb: ----- >Betreff: [PATCH v2] test: Use ut_asserteq_mem() where possible > >Quite a few tests still use ut_assertok(memcmp(...)) and variants. >Modify >them to use the macro designed for this purpose. > >Suggested-by: Wolfgang Wallner <wolfgang.wall...@br-automation.com> > >Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >--- > >Changes in v2: >- Convert two more that were missed > > test/compression.c | 8 +-- > test/dm/acpi.c | 6 +- > test/dm/axi.c | 4 +- > test/dm/dma.c | 6 +- > test/dm/eth.c | 12 ++-- > test/dm/i2c.c | 18 +++--- > test/dm/misc.c | 10 ++-- > test/dm/osd.c | 134 >+++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > test/dm/remoteproc.c | 6 +- > test/dm/sf.c | 4 +- > test/unicode_ut.c | 6 +- > 11 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Wolfgang Wallner <wolfgang.wall...@br-automation.com>