On Thursday 14 May 2020 20:01:19 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:41:52AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 May 2020 16:56:10 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 06:35:40PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 09 May 2020 21:58:19 Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> > > > > On 08/05/20 6:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:52:55PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > >> On Tuesday 28 April 2020 09:37:21 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > >>> On Monday 27 April 2020 14:00:47 Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > > >>>> I'll take care of that shortly.  Otherwise:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Ok, thank you!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hello Tom! Will you take whole patch series? Or is there anything 
> > > > > >> else
> > > > > >> needed to be done from my side for this N900 patch series?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Lokesh is the custodian for the TI tree these days, so whenever 
> > > > > > it's in
> > > > > > his next PR.  Thanks!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I see gitlab is failing to build this patch[0]. Does cross compiler 
> > > > > needs to be
> > > > > changed?
> > > > > 
> > > > > [0] https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-ti/-/jobs/91228
> > > > 
> > > > Cross compiler arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc needs to be in $PATH.
> > > > 
> > > > I figured out that on Travis it is available in ~/.buildman-toolchains
> > > > but not exported to $PATH. So for Travis build I added...
> > > > 
> > > > export 
> > > > PATH=~/.buildman-toolchains/gcc-9.2.0-nolibc/arm-linux-gnueabi/bin/:$PATH
> > > > 
> > > > ... as can be seen in the last patch.
> > > > 
> > > > Do you know where is installed arm-linux-gnueabi toolchain on Gitlab?
> > > > Maybe Tom knows it as he already wrote that would take care of updating
> > > > Gitlab image.
> > > 
> > > All of the buildman-fetched toolchains are always in the same place, so
> > > a similar change to gitlab/azure will fix those.  Thanks!
> > 
> > I see that all patches except this one were merged, thanks.
> > 
> > Tom, are you going to take look at this last patch?
> > 
> > It already passed on travis [1] [2] but I do not have those gitlab and
> > azure accounts to trigger their jobs. But I think that only correct
> > $PATH is needed for azure and gitlab.
> > 
> > [1] - https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/30
> > [2] - https://travis-ci.org/github/u-boot/u-boot/jobs/679162986
> 
> No, I've been waiting for you to make an attempt at fixing the jobs.
> Anyone can get Azure running and there's enough examples to make a
> reasonable attempt at making it work without testing.

So can you give me pointers how to run it?

And is there something more needed for travis job?

Reply via email to