On 20/05/2020 00.01, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > I need access to registers other than just the timekeeping ones of the > pcf2127, so I wanted to implement ->read8 and ->write8. But for > testing these it appeared there was no convenient way to invoke those > from the shell, so I also ended up adding such a command. > > Also, it seemed more natural to provide array variants that can read > or write several registers at once, so rtc_ops is expanded a bit. > > Changes in v2: > > - Use simply "read" and "write" instead of "read8_array", > "write8_array", both for functions and methods, as suggested by > Simon.
Urgh. The name rtc_read() is already used for a local helper by a number of rtc drivers (also rtc_write, for somewhat fewer drivers). So I can still call the methods ->read and ->write, but the functions will need another name. Probably dm_rtc_read/dm_rtc_write, since this is only for DM-enabled drivers anyway, and matches the existing dm_rtc_get/dm_rtc_set. Rasmus
